[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: Olc deployment vs slapd.conf based deployment

To: rammohan ganapavarapu <rammohanganap@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Olc deployment vs slapd.conf based deployment
From: Ryan Tandy <ryan@nardis.ca>
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2017 11:47:44 -0700
Cc: openldap-technical@openldap.org
Content-disposition: inline
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nardis.ca; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=xaqbBjxa9ppils+YzSrUswnGLT78LS2S7m7QzkQ5m1A=; b=f3nQD7V0mF1Ugx2rMLh6CrTGGd1rsF+Kf4bU6dXDlcrKRfrYmJsfKdu8+4ovfX4LxZ kRFW2Ki3z3jq9l66FnQ6rYRIN/M+rI6Uj9rwfTiKUS3kjkTdZ9X92bUWhdvx4Ld/axRD t1G8Eur6neQ1c0fh1AerY1GXs60e7iLYP8lnE=
In-reply-to: <599B4C477833584C6764EB8A@[192.168.1.30]>
Mail-followup-to: rammohan ganapavarapu <rammohanganap@gmail.com>, openldap-technical@openldap.org
References: <4e799610-4b88-8787-53c5-6fcb794be36a@stroeder.com> <WM!55ccb5fadfbb92a5e5e701b3f2fe107989aaa5f7f85473d4186bf1a0bc43c317ca2fd528537be5a77b94eab9784d3f72!@mailstronghold-1.zmailcloud.com> <EE5A467AAD37BC5FF60EF292@192.168.1.30> <00333450-1faf-4c7a-e9ee-9e9c5ab90b8e@stroeder.com> <20170915182434.5m3sx2vgkwyoeald@comet.nardis.ca> <WM!2095a05b22fc97b6b86e56d3c81275d4b763782d5d87f43d478389d9dbc3d83e73356f2d00886f401c32567316e634c4!@mailstronghold-1.zmailcloud.com> <6FC7A2523C36A116C81FB003@192.168.1.30> <CALm_Vjho9D72UPSM+1qoc2B_qiTY5WcBZWSQG_jUsPKt9mkQnQ@mail.gmail.com> <WM!16921540ae891ef08fb86caa9e69208f2b6e5a69c12b0a2eec7696d48454cfb256c12c655066fbf670ad73ccd77beac0!@mailstronghold-2.zmailcloud.com> <599B4C477833584C6764EB8A@[192.168.1.30]>
User-agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2)

On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 11:44:47AM -0700, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:

Generally it's considered a no-no. For this instance, it may be theeasiest route if you can do it without breaking things. ;)

If you do take that path, it's best if you make some kind of onlinemodification to the same schema entry afterwards (even a no-op), so thatslapd writes out the backing file again with a regenerated checksum andso forth.

References:
- Re: Olc deployment vs slapd.conf based deployment
  - From: Michael Ströder <michael@stroeder.com>
- Re: Olc deployment vs slapd.conf based deployment
  - From: Michael Ströder <michael@stroeder.com>
- Re: Olc deployment vs slapd.conf based deployment
  - From: Ryan Tandy <ryan@nardis.ca>
- Re: Olc deployment vs slapd.conf based deployment
  - From: rammohan ganapavarapu <rammohanganap@gmail.com>
- Re: Olc deployment vs slapd.conf based deployment
  - From: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@symas.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Olc deployment vs slapd.conf based deployment
Next by Date: Re: Olc deployment vs slapd.conf based deployment
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread