[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
Re: multi-value attribute rejected
- To: braduk1973@gmail.com
- Subject: Re: multi-value attribute rejected
- From: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@symas.com>
- Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2017 14:15:11 -0700
- Cc: openldap-technical@openldap.org
- Content-disposition: inline
- In-reply-to: <WM!9262a40db308491b9e02db83909a94851d34e7b3f0450be6db2271ca56f01d82a9018417ed43dae3a962dbe23d9afa9e!@mailstronghold-1.zmailcloud.com>
- References: <CAFbQbVhnV-onECYCv60hVqh1JYcqwYv=PPX4zrgd0QUacPCeEg@mail.gmail.com> <WM!b5d677aaee41b81c7825d8dde922b0969fd2762d2a708aa76380efed2c916d39a73d063d b997bc9a6105a8be415486b2!@mailstronghold-1.zmailcloud.com> <A5197A2DC6210B834EE63D08@192.168.1.30> <CAFbQbVjWNyfy+U5rJOiCNtBNgCRnQdvgoRjeXdDxibxCzfD8-A@mail.gmail.com> <WM!9262a40db308491b9e02db83909a94851d34e7b3f0450be6db2271ca56f01d82a9018417ed43dae3a962dbe23d9afa9e!@mailstronghold-1.zmailcloud.com>
--On Wednesday, July 19, 2017 7:51 PM +0100 Brad <braduk1973@gmail.com>
wrote:
Thanks for the replies Michael and Quanah, appreciated.
Here's some log output showing the content of one of the failed entries:
cACertificate;binary: 308204423082032AA00302010202010...
cACertificate;binary: 3082039C30820284A00302010202010...
Looks like the repeated cACertificate attributes do actually have
different values.
May depend on the verification routines for CACertificate binary data. Do
the two CA's have the same subject line? I haven't dug into the code yet
to see how it does the comparison for these values, so it could be way off
base.
(Note: apologies for any duplicate messages, I'm having issues getting my
posts to register with the mailing list)
The list is moderated. It may just take a bit for a moderator to approve.
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Product Architect
Symas Corporation
Packaged, certified, and supported LDAP solutions powered by OpenLDAP:
<http://www.symas.com>