Ulrich Windl wrote: >>>> Michael Ströder <michael@stroeder.com> schrieb am 06.07.2017 um 14:29 in > Nachricht <55cd37d3-e407-877e-01be-096f9f7aacae@stroeder.com>: >> Ulrich Windl wrote: >>> Should I really add an index for modifyTimestamp? I got "slapd[4021]: <= >>> bdb_inequality_candidates: (modifyTimestamp) not indexed!" (No discussions > >> on using >>> BDB, please!) >> >> The pure log message does not say much. It depends on the real filters used > >> whether you >> should index an attribute or not. >> Hint: You can make *search* performance worse with more indexes. > > Actually the accesslog database wanted that index, while no queries (not that > I knew) were made on the accesslog database. So any access to it would be some > change operation in the main database (that's how accesslog is configures: only > log changes). So I don't know the filter. You own the logs => you're the only one who can find out. Ciao, Michael.
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature