[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: Odd MMR behaviour with delta-syncrepl and refreshAndPersist

To: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@zimbra.com>
Subject: Re: Odd MMR behaviour with delta-syncrepl and refreshAndPersist
From: "Paul B. Henson" <henson@acm.org>
Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2016 15:01:35 -0700
Cc: openldap-technical@openldap.org
Content-disposition: inline
In-reply-to: <36558B88ED06430F4053180A@[192.168.1.19]>
References: <alpine.OSX.2.20.1605270839380.38351@vc104198.hiz.rqh> <20160603034312.GN21421@bender.unx.cpp.edu> <57519A3C.80108@ed.ac.uk> <36558B88ED06430F4053180A@[192.168.1.19]>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)

On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 04:06:45PM -0700, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:

> Likely <http://www.openldap.org/its/index.cgi/?findid=8432>

This is a new issue with 2.4.44? We've been running a 4 node MMR system
under 2.4.43 that's been very stable and were planning to update to
2.4.44 this summer. Would it be better to hold off on such an update?

Thanks...

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Odd MMR behaviour with delta-syncrepl and refreshAndPersist
  - From: Mark Cairney <Mark.Cairney@ed.ac.uk>
- Re: Odd MMR behaviour with delta-syncrepl and refreshAndPersist
  - From: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@zimbra.com>

References:
- Re: MMR: How do you tell that the MMR servers are in sync?
  - From: "Paul B. Henson" <henson@acm.org>
- Odd MMR behaviour with delta-syncrepl and refreshAndPersist
  - From: Mark Cairney <Mark.Cairney@ed.ac.uk>
- Re: Odd MMR behaviour with delta-syncrepl and refreshAndPersist
  - From: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@zimbra.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Odd MMR behaviour with delta-syncrepl and refreshAndPersist
Next by Date: Error message nonpresent_callback in replication
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread