[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: CSN is matching but entries count differs in master and slaves

To: scn_73@yahoo.com, openldap-technical@openldap.org
Subject: Re: CSN is matching but entries count differs in master and slaves
From: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@zimbra.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2016 12:31:28 -0700
Content-disposition: inline
Dkim-filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 edge01.zimbra.com 04EF04401B
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zimbra.com; s=C2AA288C-EE47-11E2-9BB0-E820BDD9BDBF; t=1459193521; bh=guKxl96NA9pvyRTVSZ9QnSUTBEjATB3VWTvm2/LaE94=; h=Date:From:To:Message-ID:MIME-Version; b=LbHxsWRBqJt6vBWZH28FoHCnAB1xSh6o3guATZ2174swkpLCcCgd2DJYu+EN/PJi0 yUG9TSb3nscg1vQ2WkYyByBpNTLLlMjMObWcnE2ooswDH44wGma5K0YodMJwUiQmYL E3h/757KqxUH88w/efDT67YlQ0cPdOp+AQqrhoaQ=
In-reply-to: <238353851.1082691.1459017360435.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com>
References: <238353851.1082691.1459017360435.JavaMail.yahoo.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <238353851.1082691.1459017360435.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com>

--On Saturday, March 26, 2016 7:36 PM +0000 scn_73@yahoo.com wrote:



Hello all,


CSN is matching with master and slaves but if i count number of entries
it's different. I am replicating complete DIT so count should be equal in
Master and slave.


OpenLDAP version? How did you populate the replica from the provider?

--Quanah



--

Quanah Gibson-Mount
Platform Architect
Zimbra, Inc.
--------------------
Zimbra ::  the leader in open source messaging and collaboration
A division of Synacor, Inc

Follow-Ups:
- Re: CSN is matching but entries count differs in master and slaves
  - From: <scn_73@yahoo.com>

References:
- CSN is matching but entries count differs in master and slaves
  - From: <scn_73@yahoo.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Syncrepl TLS woes
Next by Date: ITS 7345 (Add Connection Information in Access Log Entries)
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread