[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: what databases are to be replicated for a slave?
- To: Jephte Clain <email@example.com>
- Subject: Re: what databases are to be replicated for a slave?
- From: Quanah Gibson-Mount <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Fri, 08 Jan 2016 15:16:54 -0800
- Cc: email@example.com
- Content-disposition: inline
- Dkim-filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 edge02.zimbra.com B9F8EA6317
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zimbra.com; s=C2AA288C-EE47-11E2-9BB0-E820BDD9BDBF; t=1452295025; bh=cs9oMGV0aZDP8XZEek6piqFQbbZdu7RHLLTB53ZqiDY=; h=Date:From:To:Message-ID:MIME-Version; b=LOEO2umwDKIHssuxO6h2D8rwERY08bEN5nNqZCUs3M+gDXB7ubBKWdgpeInfk0CwU XG0yzS63mAEishwj+2CFGsiBbiCc7pmIx1NvcwBXExv/sk85JurVBjnnLLpd4S6FSf 4nvQqJpEGn8FISuph/7HRcvb64DxH026wdsLUbF8=
- In-reply-to: <CAPas2jQRBuUceaB83yKFdXO11N+K7M7By0FL-KJSo7i5Bu64WQ@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <5680DA4A.firstname.lastname@example.org> <8C7723C95356A14A0F8A2994@192.168.1.9> <56822AA5.email@example.com> <3605E973AA9B3F2264C20701@192.168.1.9> <568248E5.firstname.lastname@example.org> <47952E452F9C593286AEB6F2@192.168.1.9> <CAPas2jQRBuUceaB83yKFdXO11N+K7M7By0FL-KJSo7i5Bu64WQ@mail.gmail.com>
--On Wednesday, December 30, 2015 11:01 PM +0400 Jephte Clain
- a "new" one, with two masters in mirror mode (only one get the
writes at anytime thanks to the loadbalancer), and two replicas (only
data) which get all the reads. I feel like configuring chaining to be
able to write from the replicas, but I have no experience of the
benefits of this configuration...
Why not just make them all providers? You can pretend the two that aren't
behind the master URL are replicas and direct read traffic to them, and if
they do happen to get a write, the correct steps will occur, with no need
to set up chainging at all.
Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration