[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
Re: LMDB Replication
- To: Howard Chu <hyc@symas.com>
- Subject: Re: LMDB Replication
- From: Kristoffer Sjögren <stoffe@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 12:27:21 +0200
- Cc: openldap-technical@openldap.org
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=evosHbz3Z6BzJQ3DJXa4bkPS3LJSlk13867xB5Rlu6Q=; b=X/NXhB2q2qDbomyhpwjG3rkej015sGnc4rD5yjAjEnlOKlwZKKFpcXuVzVVgkHF7+d PgiaqhWlup3SiF8/5WWZ38qL5pH5GgT/nK9UAO5xQsBp0YwsOjDyp4k8O4QN7FVLv3x7 qLSlJ19r/uAJNDLxvrMeN25q+ZzrxtDjnrslp1I2pJruJGT2UDtsG+TOy44lHDDs68V1 6I6EqHM7OYkE9f+fIe3EBZkOIk+NxeE4aIW0sZqwYt/To3EJxhn1XI4Yn966GCvJSrQ4 oxGak2AE/evHV2HRK0bQIBKogy209A7mGWwLtvdaryCfV1ri7T2HgOXQKKyosCrhtZR6 fgIg==
- In-reply-to: <55B01CB1.8040405@symas.com>
- References: <CADSBNAhzRt=n=jr=0SWx0EqvUGXBBoPfrFXEVfOiZ2y6BpcE+Q@mail.gmail.com> <55B01CB1.8040405@symas.com>
Yes, the most non-intrusive I found is dynomite, but i'm not sure how
mature it is and there are no bindings for lmdb. But memcachedb with
lmdb might be an option?
Incremental backup would be an awesome feature.
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 12:44 AM, Howard Chu <hyc@symas.com> wrote:
> Kristoffer Sjögren wrote:
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> Are there any battle-tested good practices for incrementally replicating
>> LMDB?
>
>
> There are quite a few distributed data systems out there built on top of
> LMDB. Replication isn't really a subject area that's relevant to an embedded
> data store.
>
> We are still planning to add incremental backup in LMDB 1.0. Other
> mechanisms could be built on top of that pretty easily.
>
> --
> -- Howard Chu
> CTO, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com
> Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc/
> Chief Architect, OpenLDAP http://www.openldap.org/project/