[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: OpenLDAP and DH parameter size / LogJam vulnerability

To: jens@dataflake.org (Jens Vagelpohl), openldap-technical@openldap.org (ldap)
Subject: Re: OpenLDAP and DH parameter size / LogJam vulnerability
From: manu@netbsd.org (Emmanuel Dreyfus)
Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2015 03:13:19 +0200
In-reply-to: <FCEC6BD7-D7E3-4BAE-B879-B56F41F0E4C4@dataflake.org>
User-agent: MacSOUP/2.7 (unregistered for 3102 days)

Jens Vagelpohl <jens@dataflake.org> wrote:

> The issue might have appeared less important back in 2013, but now we have
> LogJam and DH groups have received proper attention. It would be great
> if the current release branch of software as important as OpenLDAP would
> handle those better.

Agreed. Admin-supplied DH parameters and ECDH support (because DH > 1024
bits is really slow) are a raising need.

-- 
Emmanuel Dreyfus
http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz
manu@netbsd.org

References:
- Re: OpenLDAP and DH parameter size / LogJam vulnerability
  - From: Jens Vagelpohl <jens@dataflake.org>

Prev by Date: Replication speed and data sizing (mdb)
Next by Date: Multi Master Openldap replication
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread