Am Sun, 26 Apr 2015 21:05:44 +0530
schrieb dE <de.techno@gmail.com>:
On 04/26/15 17:13, Michael Ströder wrote:
dE wrote:
Super this is the superclass chain --
A->B
A is defined by MUST ObjectClass MAY ( cn abc xyz cxy )
B is defined by MUST ObjectClass MAY ( cn cxy )
Then an entry belonging to B (explicit) and A (implicit,
automatically added)
cannot have attributes abc and xyz.
No!
B would have MAY ( cn abc xyz cxy ).
Example for A:
objectclass ( <some-oid-for-A>
NAME 'A'
MAY ( cn $ abc $ xyz $ cxy ) )
These three variants have the same MAY attribute set ( cn $ abc $
xyz $ cxy ):
objectclass ( <some-oid-for-B>
NAME 'B'
SUP A
MAY ( cn $ cxy ) )
objectclass ( <some-oid-for-B>
NAME 'B'
SUP A
MAY ( cn $ abc $ xyz $ cxy ) )
objectclass ( <some-oid-for-B>
NAME 'B'
SUP A )
Ciao, Michael.
Ok.
So the significance of subordinate classes is to add a MUST
attributes only. The possible attributes that any object can have is
defined in the TOP object class; regardless of what object class the
entry belongs to, any attribute listed in the TOP object class can be
added to it.
NO! The abstract objectClass 'top' only provides the attribute
'objectClass'. From schema_prep.c
( 2.5.6.0 NAME 'top' "
"DESC 'top of the superclass chain' "
"ABSTRACT MUST objectClass )",
-Dieter