[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
Re: All entries belong to the top object class?
- To: openldap-technical@openldap.org
- Subject: Re: All entries belong to the top object class?
- From: dE <de.techno@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 09:55:19 +0530
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=hi9iJgq+AFMpRFFKiW+Z0NtbiMHEBJXKF0cUpLMiAq0=; b=wQd5J7hG0yo+pRLA3XyMeqCWZkhp0x1JHVxvaBSvbE0PImAvFDXaDuVofSvp/talPN Z/Ed/MaLdfnaqqAxjfoKrp340YYPzSetH9jwXLnDWgh4nYi8qpyKXEbhZ/xq8kJpphtJ oDvZ5C2cWLEZOgrV72BUS0yd/R8BOM3YeJsxwXpnsueZH86+UhqM0aCgXP7Pz8Gw2LFB aiGVXCdbiQ5eJEDoZDD6uV2HZonCn/GotSGFEK4bVyl88Lz+ALhVrHOkJFS1MVp0CLt1 NUfAoHPPs/nxFF/0lKJAEhrk1GzJ7jA2K6FyVuqgXoQQpYPGVkH1FgdF8VK5MQcM1I6b ib2A==
- In-reply-to: <48ed-553d4000-10d-91972a0@47951464>
- References: <48ed-553d4000-10d-91972a0@47951464>
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0
On 04/27/15 01:13, Mattes wrote:
Am Sonntag, 26. April 2015 20:07 CEST, Michael Ströder <michael@stroeder.com> schrieb:
Also I don't understand what the term "significance of subordinate classes"
means to you in this context.
Yes. Might it be possible that dE (miss)reads 'SUB' as 'subprdinate' when it actually
means 'subclass'? When talking about LDAP the term 'subordinate' does have a well
defined meaning (that is irrelevant to this discussion).
Actually I meant subclass.
The possible attributes that any object can have is defined in the TOP object
class;
No!
regardless of what object class the entry belongs to, any attribute
listed in the TOP object class can be added to it.
Hmm - but while this might be true it's a tautology. Given:
objectclass ( 2.5.6.0 NAME 'top' ABSTRACT
MUST objectClass )
What attributes of 'TOP' are you talking about? ;-)
All MAY attributes. Of course the MUST must be there, but from what I
understand all MAY attributes in top can also be added regardless of
what subclass the entry belongs to.
You should really read RFC 4512 more carefully and look at existing subschema.
I give up now to explain.
May I humbly reading suggest http://www.zytrax.com/books/ldap/ch3/
Cheers, RalfD
What that book says is different from what the RFC says. besides I'm
interested in reading the latest RFC.