Re: Structural object class rules

[Michael Ströder <michael@stroeder.com>]

dE wrote:
> On 04/18/15 03:19, Michael Ströder wrote:
> > dE wrote:
> > > Actually the question was --
> > >
> > > What do you mean by 'most subordinate'? Is it that there must be no parallel
> > > structural object class at the same level in the class hierarchy?
> >
> > Yes.
>
> Strange rule. Hard to believe. Thanks for clarifying.

It's not strange because DIT content rules, DIT structure rules and name forms 
can only be applied to a *single* strutcural object class.

That's also the reason why it's not allowed to change the structural object 
class. Because if DIT structure rules and name forms are in effect it could be 
necessary to also move the entry to another part of the DIT.

Ciao, Michael.

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature