Howard Chu wrote: > Given that Cyrus-SASL has a listmechs() API, I don't see why a client would > ever have a hardcoded list of supported mechanisms. Please re-read in my posting: "At a minimum you have to register a new SASL mech as being a password-based mech." Be assured that I really know what I'm talking about: An interactive UI needs some extra effort. Ciao, Michael.
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature