I'm experimenting a bit with developing a JNI library for LMDB that utilize zero copy buffers. As you may know there is a project called lmdbjni [1] already but it does buffer copy only.
I must admit that my C and JNI skills is not really that great, so please forgive any stupidity on my part.
Anyway, i'm taking the sun.misc.Unsafe (no bounds checking) approach for memory allocation and pass memory addresses through JNI to LMDB for both writes and reads and at the moment I have implemented put, get, begin, commitÂ[2].
I suspect that something is wrong because the performance between the buffer copy and zero copy isn't really that big. lmdbjni is even faster sometimes, write commits specifically is almost twice as fast.Â
The test write 1M entries with a 4 bytes key (1-1M) and 128 bytes value (random) committed in one go. LMDB is configured identically both implementations with 4GB MDB_WRITEMAP. I run Linux 3.2.0 with Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q6600 Â@ 2.40GHz.
JProfiler show no signs of bottlenecks in Java in my implementation, most time is spent on the native methods put and commit. The opposite is true for lmdbjni where most time is spent creating and writing Java byte buffers, while native put and commit is just a fraction of that time.
Not sure exactly the significance of the gcc compiler but here is how I do it.
gcc -g -Wall -O2 -Wbad-function-cast -Wno-write-strings -fPIC -shared -I$JAVA_HOME/include -I$JAVA_HOME/include/linux -Isrc/main/native src/main/native/jlmdb.c src/main/native/liblmdb.a -o target/linux64/libjlmdb.so
- Maybe lmdbjni have defacto standard optimizations that me as a C noobie might have overlooked?
- Are there any performance counters, tracepoints or similar that might be of interest to find where latency is spent?
Greatful for any tips or pointers on how to track the problem down.
Cheers,
-Kristoffer
[1]
https://github.com/chirino/lmdbjni[2] JNI
MDB_env *mdb_env;
MDB_dbi dbi;
JNIEXPORT jlong JNICALL Java_NativeLmdb_put (JNIEnv * env, jobject obj, jlong tx, jlong keyAddress, jlong keySize, jlong valAddress, jlong valSize) {
  MDB_val mdb_key, mdb_val;
  mdb_key.mv_data = (void *)(intptr_t) keyAddress;
  mdb_key.mv_size = (size_t) keySize;
  mdb_val.mv_data = (void *)(intptr_t) valAddress;
  mdb_val.mv_size = (size_t) valSize;
  int rc = mdb_put((MDB_txn *) (intptr_t) tx, dbi, &mdb_key, &mdb_val, 0);
  return rc;
}
JNIEXPORT jlong JNICALL Java_NativeLmdb_get (JNIEnv *env, jobject o, jlong tx, jlong a, jlong s) {
  MDB_val mdb_key, mdb_val;
  mdb_key.mv_data = (void *)(intptr_t) a;
  mdb_key.mv_size = (size_t) s;
  int rc = mdb_get((MDB_txn *) (intptr_t) tx, dbi, &mdb_key, &mdb_val);
  if (rc == 0) {
    return (intptr_t) mdb_val.mv_data;
  }
  return -1;
}
JNIEXPORT void JNICALL Java_org_deephacks_lmdb_NativeLmdb_mdb_1txn_1begin(JNIEnv *env, jobject obj, jlongArray array) {
  Âjlong *nArray = (*env)->GetLongArrayElements(env, array, NULL);
  ÂMDB_txn *txn;
  Âmdb_txn_begin(mdb_env, NULL, 0, &txn);
  ÂnArray[0] = (jlong) txn;
  Â(*env)->ReleaseLongArrayElements(env, array, nArray, 0);
}
JNIEXPORT void JNICALL Java_NativeLmdb_mdb_1txn_1begin(JNIEnv *env, jobject obj, jlongArray tx) {
  Âjlong *nArray = (*env)->GetLongArrayElements(env, array, NULL);
  ÂMDB_txn *txn;
  Âmdb_txn_begin(mdb_env, NULL, 0, &txn);
  Âtx[0] = (jlong) txn;
  Â(*env)->ReleaseLongArrayElements(env, tx, nArray, 0);
}
JNIEXPORT jint JNICALL Java_NativeLmdb_mdb_1txn_1commit(JNIEnv *env, jobject obj, jlong tx) {
  return (jint)mdb_txn_commit((MDB_txn *)(intptr_t)tx);
}
JNIEXPORT void JNICALL Java_NativeLmdb_open (JNIEnv * env, jobject obj) {
  mdb_env_create(&mdb_env);
  mdb_env_set_mapsize(mdb_env, 4294967296);
  mdb_env_open(mdb_env, "/tmp/testdb", ÂMDB_WRITEMAP, 0664);
  MDB_txn *txn;
  mdb_txn_begin(mdb_env, NULL, 0, &txn);
  mdb_open(txn, NULL, 0, &dbi);
  mdb_txn_commit(txn);
}