[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: ITS #7161, ppolicy pwdFailureTime resolution should be better than 1 second

To: "Paul B. Henson" <henson@acm.org>
Subject: Re: ITS #7161, ppolicy pwdFailureTime resolution should be better than 1 second
From: Howard Chu <hyc@symas.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2014 13:51:59 -0700
Cc: openldap-technical@openldap.org
In-reply-to: <20140613225651.GI1541@bender.unx.csupomona.edu>
References: <20140523232454.GU1367@bender.unx.csupomona.edu> <537FE80E.9070808@symas.com> <03de01cf76f6$5b55dd60$12019820$@acm.org> <53801726.6090309@symas.com> <20140531000918.GG1541@bender.unx.csupomona.edu> <20140606205839.GH1541@bender.unx.csupomona.edu> <20140613225651.GI1541@bender.unx.csupomona.edu>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:29.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/29.0 SeaMonkey/2.26a1

Paul B. Henson wrote:

On Fri, Jun 06, 2014 at 01:58:39PM -0700, Paul B. Henson wrote:

I haven't seen any response to this updated patch I submitted last week;
is this now something that would be considered for integration, or are
there any other changes you'd like to see first?


Still looking for some feedback on this; good to go, needs work, or even
just don't want this enhancement...

Your posts were missed because you sent them to this discussion list, insteadof to the ITS where the actual bug report resides.


--
  -- Howard Chu
  CTO, Symas Corp.           http://www.symas.com
  Director, Highland Sun     http://highlandsun.com/hyc/
  Chief Architect, OpenLDAP  http://www.openldap.org/project/

References:
- Re: ITS #7161, ppolicy pwdFailureTime resolution should be better than 1 second
  - From: "Paul B. Henson" <henson@acm.org>
- Re: ITS #7161, ppolicy pwdFailureTime resolution should be better than 1 second
  - From: "Paul B. Henson" <henson@acm.org>

Prev by Date: Re: ITS #7161, ppolicy pwdFailureTime resolution should be better than 1 second
Next by Date: Re: ITS #7161, ppolicy pwdFailureTime resolution should be better than 1 second
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread