[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: strategy for getting groupOfNames (AD) and posixAccount (Unix) to coexist?

To: Jefferson Davis <jdavis@standard.k12.ca.us>, openldap-technical@openldap.org
Subject: Re: strategy for getting groupOfNames (AD) and posixAccount (Unix) to coexist?
From: harry.jede@arcor.de
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 22:13:56 +0100
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=arcor.de; s=mail-in; t=1393449238; bh=lHuoAQTlnvd9UHNna/5nCY1AR0CaskezdkTTEXkMKlc=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:References:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-Id; b=pQY4HiLG57XBDM9DjmA5zu5Jz7iS96NBPfn/DwBg98oLFcpUV425GjLrJI3kp9iwX Krp7lQF4SQv++PL+nXt/1pJ/d78SaXvq1RwMw7TkxGXM+uIiOdmExt2Nqd8d3L9feT kQh5Y+Sfkdw453ddu3S1IzEB0aFVHdoJWwDBGT2I=
In-reply-to: <2086024596.29320.1393446678230.JavaMail.root@standard.k12.ca.us>
References: <2086024596.29320.1393446678230.JavaMail.root@standard.k12.ca.us>
User-agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.2.0-4-amd64; KDE/4.8.4; x86_64; ; )

Am Mittwoch, 26. Februar 2014 schrieb Jefferson Davis:
> Sorry to be dense, but it appears I create my schema file from the
> attribute definitions in the RFC, is that correct?
Yes

-- 

Harry Jede

Prev by Date: Re: memberOf values case
Next by Date: Re: memberOf values case
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread