Christian Kratzer wrote: > very interesting point. > > I have a customer with an enterprise application that insists on having an > explicit objectClass: top on all entries. > > Their developers argue that the rfcs mandate an explicit objectClass: top on > all entries. I argue that the wording in the respective rfcs is not exact > enough. Having an objectClass that inherits from top should be enough from my > point of view. > > I am currently travelling and cannot lookup the rfc. I vaguely remember having researched this as well many years ago. Don't remember the details but I came up with the following recommendations: For client developers: Don't require object class 'top'. For LDAP admins: Add object class 'top' to all entries. Ciao, Michael.
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature