[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: Antw: Re: Structural object issues
On Wed, 13 Nov 2013, Ulrich Windl wrote:
> >>> Quanah Gibson-Mount <firstname.lastname@example.org> schrieb am 13.11.2013 um 02:24 in
> Nachricht <90CA8980100EF12CE4C38252@[192.168.1.93]>:
> > --On Tuesday, November 12, 2013 6:03 PM -0600 Alex Moen <email@example.com>
> > wrote:
> >> Any advice on this? What would the proper way to fix it be?
> > Add a structural objectClass to the entry. All objects are required to
> > have a basic structural objectClass.
> Sure? slapadd needs it, but ldapadd refuses to accept a structural
> objectclass specification in my experience.
The original poster was trying to add this LDIF:
'top' is an abstract object class, while extensibleObject is an auxiliary
object class, so none of that entry's object classes are structural object