Ulrich Windl wrote: > I wonder what the minimum required access rights for the attributes of > shadowAccount are: Should they be protected the same way the password is? > At the moment an anonymous bind can read them (i.e. no special access rules > present). by * None should be sufficient. Serious: You probably won't need 'shadowAccount' at all. Ciao, Michael.
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature