[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: Glueing together backend databases - meta, glue or chain?
On 17 July 2012 16:06, Aaron Richton <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Jul 2012, Pieter Baele wrote:
> Given databases:
>> --- dc=common,dc=example,dc=org
>> --- dc=shared,dc=example,dc=org
>> --- dc=companyA,dc=example,dc=org
>> --- dc=companyB,dc=example,dc=org
>> --- dc=companyC,dc=example,dc=org
>> all slaves represent this as "dc=example,dc=org"
> it looks like a really good situation for a simple glue configuration using
> the "subordinate" keyword; see slapd.conf(5).
What lives under ou=CompanyA etc? User accounts? Something we do for
this to keep the DIT level shallow, is to keep all user accounts in
ou=Users and filter based on o=CompanyA which is an attribute on that
user entry. Then you can use slapo-dynlist to create company groups
Not sure what ACLs you've got or the overall function of your
directory server to advise a new DIT.
T +44 (0) 1224 279484
M +44 (0) 7930 323266
F +44 (0) 1224 824887
Open Source. Open Solutions(tm).
Suretec Systems is a limited company registered in Scotland. Registered
number: SC258005. Registered office: 24 Cormack Park, Rothienorman, Inverurie,
Aberdeenshire, AB51 8GL.
Subject to disclaimer at http://www.suretecgroup.com/disclaimer.html
Do you know we have our own VoIP provider called SureVoIP? See
Did you see our API news?