[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: LDAP entries missing from search results depending on search base.
--On Thursday, April 05, 2012 9:44 AM +0200 Michael StrÃder
Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
In the meantime, download RE24 and see if back-mdb
does better for you.
Are you serious? The bug Brandon observed and which I can confirm is a
serious threat to LDAP functional model. I could definitely reproduce it
for a while.
Yes, I'm quite serious. It would be worthwhile to confirm whether or not
back-mdb suffers the same issue. The issues I've seen with back-hdb that
are similar to this (ITS#6983, for example), is due to the IDL cache code
in back-hdb. back-mdb does not have an IDL cache. So if you can't
reproduce it with back-mdb, it is likely the issue is once again in the IDL
cache. Regardless, an ITS should most certainly be filed by Brandon so
this can be tracked and fixed.
IMO back-mdb is still rather experimental though I definitely appreciate
all the work done recently.
I think it is at least beta quality as of yesterday. I'm running it in
production now on a few servers, and except for the issues I had with
accesslog cleanup (which is what got fixed yesterday), it has been quite
stable for a few weeks.
Sr. Member of Technical Staff
A Division of VMware, Inc.
Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration