[Date Prev][Date Next]
- To: email@example.com
- Subject: Scaling LDAP
- From: Gaurav Gugnani <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 11:08:17 +0530
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=cJkEVft6PqqOhEOI0bteaNhPjbM7ATNzRZmJB1NLSIk=; b=dFalTJd/lxcJTNtn0eHWA1gkGsfSw0pMZzcepQdc7WkTDvPbv4gUTzeCzMAZCcmjvF D/tUEruQHsI4GpMVTUfGRU/AT9ApPsxbbwdm97s5J3Ywu0sKR3zZoscewDEZ8Eb1a+Ip yoCt8xrG9joT38Wup9xATWt0hWaRRXFXXk0dGcqbvMRFpvkjYSnlkmhwdlrpZdoIZnPr 6O4ic/byUe3wCwbvCkwHpEHd6R4oWy+hsItGuBjjnzE/Itq92KL3NgRFdlIT8pRgEfvn OEU0Aa7zBQDd2D4mJEk3tAColjLdUK6ecOvP1r6tCOAgZovO+BhuUv3Jcc8Z496BEtYZ Uh+w==
First of all thks for helping me out with the issues on openLDAP.
Well today, my query is pretty generic and lot many people working on LDAP would face such an issues.
We are using openldap 2.4.26 with BDB as backend. We've installed the setup on linux machine of 64 bit with 4GB ram. Now, currently we have some 10K records in it and its working perfectly fine. Our systems is running under replication - syncrepl.
However, in near future we can foresee some million of records to turn up. So, Can any one please advise - What are the different Scaling options available with LDAP?
I need to do some research and test our cases.
Thanks and Regards,