Re: DEL don't get synced

[Marc Patermann <hans.moser@ofd-z.niedersachsen.de>]

Buchan,

Buchan Milne schrieb (21.02.2012 12:48 Uhr):
> On Tuesday, 21 February 2012 12:41:40 Marc Patermann wrote:
> > Buchan Milne schrieb (21.02.2012 11:38 Uhr):
> > > As far as I have read in changelogs and ITS, anything from
> > > OPENLDAP_REL_ENG_2_4 (including 2.4.29) before:
> > >
> > > commit 10c81e2a46c9b603ba1dfcf53422573d5068ba04
> > > Author: Howard Chu <hyc@openldap.org>
> > > Date:   Sun Feb 12 21:07:25 2012 -0800
> > >
> > >     ITS#7162 Revert "ITS#7052 ignore Adds with too old entryCSN"
> > >     
> > >     This reverts commit ba4366eae098c0e4950a78b1da8d79ffe8b34fee.
> > >     The patch caused a regression (ITS#7162).
> > >
> > > will probably still be broken.
> > Thank you. But what does this mean to me exactly?
> > What is the best to try now?
>
> Current OPENLDAP_REL_ENG_2_4 from git, or 2.4.29 with the 2 or 3 commits in 
> OPENLDAP_REL_ENG_2_4, or a package that has them (I have RPMs internally, but 
> my public repo is down for a bit).
Thanks again.
With building plain 2.4.29 I got the same test-054 error like Michael 
postet in #7162.
I'm building with OPENLDAP_REL_ENG_2_4 (for the next 2 h) now.

Marc