[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: DEL don't get synced


Buchan Milne schrieb (21.02.2012 12:48 Uhr):
On Tuesday, 21 February 2012 12:41:40 Marc Patermann wrote:
Buchan Milne schrieb (21.02.2012 11:38 Uhr):
As far as I have read in changelogs and ITS, anything from
OPENLDAP_REL_ENG_2_4 (including 2.4.29) before:

commit 10c81e2a46c9b603ba1dfcf53422573d5068ba04
Author: Howard Chu <hyc@openldap.org>
Date:   Sun Feb 12 21:07:25 2012 -0800

    ITS#7162 Revert "ITS#7052 ignore Adds with too old entryCSN"
This reverts commit ba4366eae098c0e4950a78b1da8d79ffe8b34fee.
    The patch caused a regression (ITS#7162).

will probably still be broken.
Thank you. But what does this mean to me exactly?
What is the best to try now?

Current OPENLDAP_REL_ENG_2_4 from git, or 2.4.29 with the 2 or 3 commits in OPENLDAP_REL_ENG_2_4, or a package that has them (I have RPMs internally, but my public repo is down for a bit).
Thanks again.
With building plain 2.4.29 I got the same test-054 error like Michael postet in #7162.
I'm building with OPENLDAP_REL_ENG_2_4 (for the next 2 h) now.