[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: MDB name

To: openldap-technical <openldap-technical@openldap.org>
Subject: Re: MDB name
From: "Brett @Google" <brett.maxfield@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2011 17:33:26 +0700
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=RlWMpteHws6e3jpkeUeey7g11rSnoVNrWEHqVLLtEW0=; b=lCUX9807b1GXZ6h2PCd4efBRv0Ebbp+ge9GkWDoBDosAXuQnedHKoF0ovkDRTP2Hxv Niqh77HGEbT6+3jcMqSJ/rl4+tCtoF1fCdKLEfuZxKx6Kfv2jBfloqROkpBvc0qx4Qts AV9tK5SU+nExLP9fq0X3QBpeIZ0QbviNi2Vy4=
In-reply-to: <4EBF9943.7040400@symas.com>
References: <4EBF9943.7040400@symas.com>

FDB (fast db?) - off the top of my head, seems unique enough

On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 5:17 PM, Howard Chu <hyc@symas.com> wrote:

What's in a name... Apparently "MDB" is already a well-known suffix for Microsoft Access database files. "mdb" is also the name of a debugger tool in Solaris. To avoid confusion with those unrelated items, it might be a good idea to rename our MDB to something else. Now, before the next OpenLDAP release is published. Comments?

--
The only thing that interferes with my learning is my education.

Albert Einstein

Follow-Ups:
- Re: MDB name
  - From: Howard Chu <hyc@symas.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Using NSS
Next by Date: Re: MDB name
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread