[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: MDB name
- To: openldap-technical <email@example.com>
- Subject: Re: MDB name
- From: "Brett @Google" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2011 17:33:26 +0700
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=RlWMpteHws6e3jpkeUeey7g11rSnoVNrWEHqVLLtEW0=; b=lCUX9807b1GXZ6h2PCd4efBRv0Ebbp+ge9GkWDoBDosAXuQnedHKoF0ovkDRTP2Hxv Niqh77HGEbT6+3jcMqSJ/rl4+tCtoF1fCdKLEfuZxKx6Kfv2jBfloqROkpBvc0qx4Qts AV9tK5SU+nExLP9fq0X3QBpeIZ0QbviNi2Vy4=
- In-reply-to: <4EBF9943.email@example.com>
- References: <4EBF9943.firstname.lastname@example.org>
FDB (fast db?) - off the top of my head, seems unique enough
On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 5:17 PM, Howard Chu <email@example.com>
What's in a name... Apparently "MDB" is already a well-known suffix for Microsoft Access database files. "mdb" is also the name of a debugger tool in Solaris. To avoid confusion with those unrelated items, it might be a good idea to rename our MDB to something else. Now, before the next OpenLDAP release is published. Comments?
The only thing that interferes with my learning is my education.