Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:From what I see on the list, people who use normal syncrepl do not have reliable replication.Frankly this sounds scary! Especially since you have more knowledge of the internals here... :-/With delta-syncrepl, the changes are read directly out of a changes database, in order. The gains are significant.IIRC with delta-syncrepl all write operations are serialized. Yes?
Correct. This improves performance significantly over normal syncrepl. It may seem counter intuitive, and yet it reduces the contention in the underlying database. I tested this heavily in the past. ;)
--Quanah -- Quanah Gibson-Mount Sr. Member of Technical Staff Zimbra, Inc A Division of VMware, Inc. -------------------- Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration