[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: Large "dynamic" groups and performance
--On Tuesday, April 05, 2011 10:48 AM -0400 Al <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
My environment and settings:
HP blade server, 8 cores @ 2.67Ghz, Redhat 5.3, OpenLDAP 2.4.25, Berkeley
set_cachesize 2 0 1
set_flags Â Â Â DB_TXN_NOSYNC
You never state the size of your database (how many dns), or the disk size
of your database (du -c -h *.bdb), so there is no way to tell if these
settings are in any way valid.
I don't see a checkpoint setting for slapd.conf/cn=config, and I don't see
an idlcachesize setting.
Also, you are definitely not using "dynamic" groups in the OpenLDAP sense
of the word, although they would probably perform significantly better for
Sr. Member of Technical Staff
A Division of VMware, Inc.
Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration