On Tuesday 05 October 2010 04:35:59 Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote: > --On Tuesday, October 05, 2010 4:22 AM +0200 Andreas Ntaflos > > <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote: > > Hi Quanah, thank you too for your reply! > > > > Could you elaborate on using an empty base/suffix? The concept > > seems strange to me and I don't really understand the implications > > (but I have very little experience with LDAP as of yet). However, > > googling around most posts seem to describe only problems with > > empty suffixes. Do you know of any examples or documentation that > > describe this approach more detailed? > > Download and install Zimbra, it uses exactly this approach. And I've > been using the empty suffix for years, it works just fine. There > have been issues unique to it in the past. I've always wanted to have a look at Zimbra and to see how and if we could integrate it in our hosting setup. Now I have a second reason, thanks. It's quite a beast, though. Andreas
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.