[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: So I finally upgraded from slurpd...
On Tue, 20 Jul 2010, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
> --On Tuesday, July 20, 2010 5:40 PM +0200 Kolbjørn Barmen
> <email@example.com> wrote:
> > Perhaps slapadd/slapd should be able to deal with such duplicate entries
> > better, to make it more obivous what's wrong? I'm just saying :)
> What options did you use with slapadd? If you used -q, this is probably
> expected. If you did not, I suggest filing an ITS, although slapadd is
> never really as strict as ldapadd will be. It is meant for loading LDIF
> created by an export, which should already be sane.
I did not use -q.
ITS submitted: http://www.openldap.org/its/index.cgi/Incoming?id=6592