[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: Textual LDIF backup strategies for busy LDAP clusters
--On Monday, June 28, 2010 11:42 AM +1000 Nick Urbanik
Thanks again for taking the time to write a detailed and helpful
On 25/06/10 10:41 -0700, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
--On Friday, June 25, 2010 9:58 AM +1000 Nick Urbanik
On 23/06/10 21:46 -0700, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
--On Thursday, June 24, 2010 12:19 PM +1000 Nick Urbanik
auditlog is not appropriate.
Please can you explain why this is so?
Auditlog is a poorly written overlay that hopefully will be deleted
in the future. It kills perf, and in general is not recommended for
use. If you want a record of changes, I suggest you look at the
1. Can we use an LDIF backend with the auditlog overlay?
Why are you stuck on auditlog? As I said, don't use it.
2. Has anyone written a program to convert the auditlog data to an
LDIF format that can be applied with ldapmodify?
No idea. As I said, it's not really a usable piece of software.
One of the advantages of syncrepl (Although I use and prefer
delta-syncrepl, since syncrepl has not proven reliable in my
We are avoiding delta-syncrepl because, for reliability, we want to
use mirror-mode, and at
under section 18.104.22.168. Arguments against MirrorMode is written:
"Delta-Syncrepl is not yet supported"
3. Does this mean that we are aiming for a less reliable replication
with syncrepl that with delta-syncrepl?
You can still enable the accesslog overlay regardless of what replication
mechanism is used between the mirrors. As for the reliability, as I said,
in my experience, delta-syncrepl has been reliable.
4. Is there any prospect of delta-syncrepl being supported with
Yes, that's a future request.
Principal Software Engineer
Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration