Re: syncrepl vs is_entry_objectclass "2.5.17.0" no objectClass attribute

[Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@zimbra.com>]

--On Wednesday, June 16, 2010 5:15 PM +0200 Dieter Kluenter 
<dieter@dkluenter.de> wrote:

> Am Wed, 16 Jun 2010 15:20:45 +0200
> schrieb <Guy.Baconniere@swisscom.com>:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > A syncrepl with a searchbase of "dc=foo,dc=bar" is working fine but
> > not with a empty/null "" searchbase. On the provider side I have the
> > following error "is_entry_objectclass("", "2.5.17.0") no objectClass
> > attribute" and on the consumer I have "do_syncrep2: rid=002 (32) No
> > such object".
> >
> > ldapsearch -LLL -h foo.bar -p 389 -x -D 'cn=syncrepl,dc=foo,dc=bar'
> > -w '*****' -b '' -s sub '(objectclass=*)' '*' '+' Do not have any
> > issue to retrieve the full DIT(s) and is able to find the sub of root
> > object.
> >
> > Is it possible to replicate an null/empty searchbase with syncrepl ?
> >
> > If not how can I replicate part of a null/empty searchbase setup on a
> > provider ?
> >
> > Best Regards,
> > Guy Baconniere
> >
> > I am running OpenLDAP slapd 2.4.11 on Debian Lenny.
>
> [...]
> I don't know whether this is applicable to 2.4.11 already, but you may
> add olcSyncUseSubentry: TRUE
> to the provider's config database. See slapd-config(5) for more
> information.

Not necessary.  Of course, using 2.4.11 is suicidal anyway.

--Quanah


--

Quanah Gibson-Mount
Principal Software Engineer
Zimbra, Inc
--------------------
Zimbra ::  the leader in open source messaging and collaboration