[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: Server certificate

2010/5/31 Daniel Gomes <dgomes@ipfn.ist.utl.pt>:
> Hey there,
> I've got a simple enough question: is it possible to use a certificate for
> TLS (through the TLSCertificateFile directive) on which the FQDN of the LDAP
> server is not on the CN but instead on the alternative name? I tried this,
> but I'm getting a "TLS init def ctx failed: -64" and I thought it might be
> because of this issue. I also couldn't find a list of the error numbers and
> their descriptions, making it harder for me to understand what's wrong...
> Cheers,
> --

You can. Did that a few weeks ago.

Frank Van Damme
A: Because it destroys the flow of the conversation.
Q: Why is it bad?
A: No, it's bad.
Q: Should I top post in replies to mailing lists or on Usenet?