On Mon, 2008-03-17 at 07:21 +0100, Pierangelo Masarati wrote: > Andrew Bartlett wrote: > > On Mon, 2008-03-17 at 07:08 +0100, Pierangelo Masarati wrote: > >> Andrew Bartlett wrote: > >> > >>> Is the refint module synchronous or transaction based? > >> Asynchronous, but no transaction. It does its best to preserve > >> integrity, but in case of failure errors are just logged and do not > >> alter the result of the add operation. > > > > OK. I really need it to be synchronous, within a transaction. If the > > linked DN is invalid, then I need the whole operation to have never > > happened. I test certain invalid operations in this test script, which > > is probably why we end up here. > > > > I'm beginning to suspect this is in direct conflict with my first > > requirement, to operate globally... > > Making it (optionally) synchronous shouldn't be a big deal; Any chance of that including pre-op validation and post-op implementation? That would get us most of the way. > making it > transactional is totally another business (at least until transaction > support is available, at least for internal operations). Any idea if/when this will be available? Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett http://samba.org/~abartlet/ Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org Samba Developer, Red Hat Inc.
Description: This is a digitally signed message part