[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: Missing Syntax
Michael Ströder wrote:
Nik Svoboda wrote:
I have noticed that in the openldap system I am using, the schema has
a missing syntax. This syntax is "126.96.36.199.4.1.14188.8.131.52.58" ;
According to CVS, Substring Assertion was added to OpenLDAP on 2007-May-17.
Your version of OpenLDAP must be extremely old.
This is referenced in matching types using
partial matching of strings (exactsubstringsmatch,
numericStringSubstringsMatch, ...). I am fairly new to these subjects
and do not understand fully how they operate.
What do you mean which "matching types"? "Matching rules" or
Is there a way to correct this?
Depends on what you really want to achieve. Can you tell us?
Looking into RFC 2252 and RFC 3698 I cannot imagine what you want.
Are the syntaxes and matching types
specified in a way that can be modified dynamically?
Syntaxes and their matching rules have to be coded in C. There's
no dynamic configuration for these.
Not yet, I suppose. Eventually, in Forth.
-- Howard Chu
Chief Architect, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com
Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc/
Chief Architect, OpenLDAP http://www.openldap.org/project/