[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: CN must be indexed?

On Sat, 2008-01-05 at 22:37 -0800, Howard Chu wrote:
> Howard Chu wrote:
> > You have "index name eq" which is a supertype of cn. That means cn is going to
> > be indexed anyway. It could be that we have a bug here, not checking the
> > supertype's index. I'll look into that.
> There was a bug in HEAD due to the broken component matching support code. 
> This bug doesn't occur in 2.4 or 2.3 since that code is already disabled in 
> the releases. I've #if'd it out of HEAD as well. But in the meantime, you 
> should rethink what you're indexing.

Ahh, yes.  I no longer use 'name' (instead adding a new attribute
samba4RDN to hold the relative distinguished name), so I shall move the
index to that attribute.

Andrew Bartlett

Andrew Bartlett
Authentication Developer, Samba Team           http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Red Hat Inc.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part