[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: delta-syncrepl missing changes

Francis Swasey wrote:
> On 3/10/09 12:20 PM, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
>> --On Tuesday, March 10, 2009 10:49 AM -0400 Francis Swasey 
>>> To be specific, there are changes that make it into the master server,
>>> and the auditlog overlay logs them, but the accesslog overlay does NOT
>>> put them in the accesslog database, so they do not get sent to the
>>> replica servers.
>>> It seems to be some kind of race condition.  I haven't figured out a way
>>> to reproduce the failure yet.
>> Oh, you have auditlog in place too?  I don't believe you mentioned that 
>> before.  I bet it is related to them both being enabled.
> It is the first time I've mentioned it in this thread, but I've 
> mentioned it in previous threads.
> So -- why would having auditlog and accesslog (and syncprov) all used 
> with a database cause accesslog to miss some of the changes?

Why not just have another process suck out the contents of accesslog you're interested in
auditing and write it to a log file. Having both overlays is kinda redundant.

Russell A. Jackson <raj@csub.edu>
Network Analyst
California State University, Bakersfield

Life is like a tin of sardines.
We're, all of us, looking for the key.
		-- Beyond the Fringe

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature