[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: Problem with back-ldap and slapo-rwn
Howard Chu wrote:
Why not just patch the 2.2 server to include authzTo as an alias of the
The issue here is that the 2.2 server is a legagy, but productive
legacy. The reason for that proxy construct is to make sure that new
systems can point to the new 2.4 server with better security, different
SASL stuff, etc., then we plan to move the physical data from back-ldap
So when you say "patch the 2.2 server", would be have to patch the code,
i.e. compile the whole thing from scratch? I think given the above, this
isn't really an option. Or would there be any other way (in 2.2) to make
the authzTo attribute an alias of saslAuthzTo?
Pierangelo Masarati wrote:
> I was rather interested in seeing the alleged crash of the 2.4 server.
I can produce that crashdump for you independent of a solution to our
problem. And I am 99% sure that the crash in the 2.4 server will stay
even after solving our problem.