[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: syncrepl with more that one database
Who is this Quanah guy who keeps coming out with the wrong info? ;)
On 2/9/08, Quanah Gibson-Mount <email@example.com> wrote:
> --On Saturday, February 09, 2008 9:27 AM -0800 James Hartley
> <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > ah very good.... The documentaion I read seems to imply the number was
> > tied to the replica,
> > ie if the slave one used rid 001 then slave2 would use rid002.
> > According to your email
> > I would need rid001 for database 1 and rid002 for database 2 in the
> > conf file for slave 1 and if I had another slave, say slave2 I would
> > need to have an rid003 and rid004.
> > Thank you for clarifying this point.
> Keep replies on the list. And no, you are incorrect still. The RIDs need
> to be unique per database, on a given replica. So rid001 and rid002 on
> replica1, rid001 and rid002 on replica2, is just fine.
> Quanah Gibson-Mount
> Principal Software Engineer
> Zimbra, Inc
> Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration
Sent from Google Mail for mobile | mobile.google.com