[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: Regarding distributed directory services : ldap_add_s: Insufficientaccess (50)

To: openldap-software@openldap.org
Subject: Re: Regarding distributed directory services : ldap_add_s: Insufficientaccess (50)
From: Buchan Milne <bgmilne@staff.telkomsa.net>
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 10:41:13 +0200
Cc: Rakesh Yadav <rkyadav@cdac.in>
Content-disposition: inline
In-reply-to: <037d01c83c80$32e8b0d0$7705a8c0@RakeshWxp>
References: <032e01c83bf8$3abca970$7705a8c0@RakeshWxp> <Pine.SOC.4.64.0712111127260.4806@toolbox.rutgers.edu> <037d01c83c80$32e8b0d0$7705a8c0@RakeshWxp>
User-agent: KMail/1.9.7

On Wednesday 12 December 2007 07:31:05 Rakesh Yadav wrote:
> Hi,

> ---------------
> Server
> ---------------

[...]

> ldap_add_s: Insufficient access (50)
>         additional info: no write access to parent

[..]

> ---------------
> At the same time getting these msg at CLIENT :
> ---------------

[...]

> bdb_add: no write access to parent

[...]

> Now tell me whats the problem.

The log tells you what the problem is, if you bother to read it.

Regards,
Buchan

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Regarding distributed directory services : ldap_add_s: Insufficientaccess (50)
  - From: "Rakesh Yadav" <rkyadav@cdac.in>

References:
- Regarding distributed directory services : ldap_add_s: Insufficient access (50)
  - From: "Rakesh Yadav" <rkyadav@cdac.in>
- Re: Regarding distributed directory services : ldap_add_s: Insufficient access (50)
  - From: Aaron Richton <richton@nbcs.rutgers.edu>
- Re: Regarding distributed directory services : ldap_add_s: Insufficientaccess (50)
  - From: "Rakesh Yadav" <rkyadav@cdac.in>

Prev by Date: Re: Strange TLS behaviour with slapd 2.3.30 on Debian Etch
Next by Date: Re: Regarding distributed directory services : ldap_add_s: Insufficientaccess (50)
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread