Re: 2.4.6 prov/con, delta-syncrepl and auditContext

[Michael Ströder <michael@stroeder.com>]

Pierangelo Masarati wrote:
> I think in this case we're sort of chasing a red herring (is this the
> right idiom?); in fact, the auditContext only makes sense in the provider.
>  In the consumer it should at least be a referral, since no log context is
> present, but actually the consumer shouldn't be aware of that context, not
> that way, at least.  The best solution, IMHO, is to remove the
> auditContext attribute from the replicated attrs.

I'm fine with not replicating attribute auditContext.

Ciao, Michael.