[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: "descriptor table size" errors?
On 7/16/07, Tony Earnshaw <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
Quanah Gibson-Mount skrev, on 15-07-2007 23:45:
>> Kudos to Buchan:
>> 2 surmises:
>> 1: RHL5 and FC6 both have BDB 4.3 as standard; Buchan's srpm (and,
>> believe me, I refuse to install *ANY* software without it being available
>> as an rpm. If it's not, I bake my own - but Buchan's srpm is far superior
>> to anything I could bake myself) is "intelligent" enough to see that Red
>> Hat has given me an unstable version of BDB and substitute a stable
>> version - 5-patched 4.2.52 for his OpenLDAP alone - all the other RH
>> stuff continues to use 4.3;
> Only 5 patches for 4.2.52? There's a rather important 6th one...
Which I was planning on adding over the past weekend ... but my house
was burgled and my laptop stolen ... which is why I've been a bit out
of things for the past week or so.
I'll be updating quite soon ...