[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: Recommended back-end

To: "Aaron Richton" <richton@nbcs.rutgers.edu>
Subject: Re: Recommended back-end
From: "Daniel Corbe" <daniel.junkmail@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 11:31:45 -0400
Cc: openldap-software@openldap.org
In-reply-to: <Pine.SOC.4.64.0707171110050.2445@toolbox.rutgers.edu>
References: <cceb89df0707170634t38aa034cqa816cde8b7679c81@mail.gmail.com> <Pine.SOC.4.64.0707171110050.2445@toolbox.rutgers.edu>

Good answer. Thanks.

-Daniel

On 7/17/07, Aaron Richton < richton@nbcs.rutgers.edu> wrote:

Pretty unviable and quite a bit slower. As an aside, the "default"
nowadays is bdb/hdb (Sleepycat) based.

http://www.openldap.org/faq/data/cache/378.html

On Tue, 17 Jul 2007, Daniel Corbe wrote:

> I was wondering what the viability of switching to a MySQL-based back-end
> would be and how much slower it is compared to the default gdbm back-end.
> -Daniel
>

References:
- Recommended back-end
  - From: "Daniel Corbe" <daniel.junkmail@gmail.com>
- Re: Recommended back-end
  - From: Aaron Richton <richton@nbcs.rutgers.edu>

Prev by Date: Re: Recommended back-end
Next by Date: Re: Replication architecture
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread