[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: posixgroup and groupofnames

To: Andreas Hasenack <ahasenack@terra.com.br>
Subject: Re: posixgroup and groupofnames
From: James Tran <james@nttmcl.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 15:37:37 -0700
Cc: Hallvard B Furuseth <h.b.furuseth@usit.uio.no>, openldap-software@openldap.org
In-reply-to: <20070410203336.GA8671@mandriva.com.br>
References: <461BB3B8.10004@nttmcl.com> <hbf.20070410t6qr@bombur.uio.no> <EBEC12FD5CFADE8FED1CE6A4@deus-ex.stanford.edu> <hbf.20070410se9h@bombur.uio.no> <20070410203336.GA8671@mandriva.com.br>
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221)

Andreas Hasenack wrote:

On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 08:27:37PM +0200, Hallvard B Furuseth wrote:
Quanah Gibson-Mount writes:
Or you can just create a normal group...
Yes, but I thought that was what he didn't want. (Though my reply may be a fine illustration of why he should do that anyway:-)
It's always good to learn about sets, they are very powerfull

Thanks for all the suggestions guys. I ended up taking the easy way out and just making the groupofnames instead of bundling them. The other stuff looks very useful though and i'm glad i got that post anyway just in case i need it for the future.

References:
- posixgroup and groupofnames
  - From: James Tran <james@nttmcl.com>
- Re: posixgroup and groupofnames
  - From: Hallvard B Furuseth <h.b.furuseth@usit.uio.no>
- Re: posixgroup and groupofnames
  - From: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@stanford.edu>
- Re: posixgroup and groupofnames
  - From: Hallvard B Furuseth <h.b.furuseth@usit.uio.no>
- Re: posixgroup and groupofnames
  - From: Andreas Hasenack <ahasenack@terra.com.br>

Prev by Date: Re: deferring operation: pending operations
Next by Date: slapo-ppolicy container question
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread