[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: LDIF format question for Openldap-2.3.27

To: openldap-software@openldap.org
Subject: Re: LDIF format question for Openldap-2.3.27
From: "Svend Sorensen" <ssorensen@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 11:28:09 -0700
Content-disposition: inline
In-reply-to: <7ff9c2a10704051124n3160f53eve39bf03ba4ff8328@mail.gmail.com>
References: <46151F47.6010008@gmail.com> <7E5574E405A9F041BF0BF4C78D893726172F9B@ntexchange2.qfa05.quinnfable.com> <7ff9c2a10704051124n3160f53eve39bf03ba4ff8328@mail.gmail.com>

On 4/5/07, Svend Sorensen wrote:

On 4/5/07, Venkat Reddy Valluri wrote:
>
> dn: cn=testApp,cn=jdbc,dc=production,dc=net
> fnDbFactoryName: OCCDataSourceFactory
> fnDbCacheScheme: DYNAMIC
> fnDbMaxLimit: 10
> fnDbUser: testApp
> objectClass: fnDbConPool
> fnDbPasswd: testApp
> fnDbMinLimit: 2
> fnDbURL: jdbc:oracle:thin:@test.com:1521:test

You are missing the objectClass


I didn't see the objectClass line.  Is fnDbConPool a structural objectClass?

and cn attributes in your entry.

Follow-Ups:
- RE: LDIF format question for Openldap-2.3.27
  - From: "Venkat Reddy Valluri" <venkat.valluri@quinnfable.com>

References:
- Re: LDIF format question for Openldap-2.3.27
  - From: paul kölle <pkoelle@gmail.com>
- RE: LDIF format question for Openldap-2.3.27
  - From: "Venkat Reddy Valluri" <venkat.valluri@quinnfable.com>
- Re: LDIF format question for Openldap-2.3.27
  - From: "Svend Sorensen" <ssorensen@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: LDIF format question for Openldap-2.3.27
Next by Date: RE: LDIF format question for Openldap-2.3.27
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread