[Date Prev][Date Next]
RE: LDAP/BDB log purging
- To: "'Quanah Gibson-Mount'" <firstname.lastname@example.org>, <email@example.com>
- Subject: RE: LDAP/BDB log purging
- From: "Lesley Walker" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 16:01:38 +1300
- In-reply-to: <66E1A97F118FE2C7898BB34C@deus-ex.stanford.edu>
- Organization: Opus International Consultants
- References: <00da01c75acf$bf880100$a706000a@grpc011><email@example.com><011301c75b82$242d1980$a706000a@grpc011> <66E1A97F118FE2C7898BB34C@deus-ex.stanford.edu>
- Thread-index: AcdblQ9mlbBW6ynYTpi5xXPKEtzQiQAD62BQ
Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
> I see no checkpoint directive for this database. You
> definitely want that.
Okay. I've done some reading and now know how to specify it, but I'm open to
suggestions as to how to choose the numbers.
We have just over 9000 records (increasing by a handful every day). Updates
are probably no more than 100 per day but we need to make sure they
replicate quickly. "people" records are about 5-6kb.
Would something like this be appropriate?
checkpoint 10 5
And on the BDB version question:
> The question is, what version of BDB is slapd linked to? For
> example, if
> slapd is linked against BDB 4.4, and you ran the BDB 4.2
> db_archive, that's bad.
No, it was linked against 4.2.
Linux Systems Administrator
Opus International Consultants Ltd
Tel +64 4 471 7002, Fax +64 4 473 3017
Level 9 Majestic Centre, 100 Willis Street, PO Box 12 343
Wellington, New Zealand