[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: Syncrepl questions
Hm I don't recall, did this extra debugging actually help pinpoint any
problems? If so I can commit in the main source tree.
As I recall, the original point was to verify the if/else logic (which was
and remains good), which turned out to be a herring. But it did point out
a corruption in one of the csn values (became obvious when the Debug()
started printing garbage). It is a bit of a chatty Debug(), but I've been
using it in production since 2.3.25 (hence the filename) figuring that
it's better to have the information for debugging than to just have a
"wow, that didn't replicate right, wonder why."
Might be nice to have it committed, though. It'd save me one local patch
at a minimum...