[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: misc.schema bundled with OpenLDAP - recommended?
<quote who="Tony Earnshaw">
> Gavin Henry wrote:
>> I notice that misc.schema says at the top:
>> 20 # Not recommended for production use!
>> 21 # Use with extreme caution!
>> This definitely the case?, as I wanted to use 'nisMailAlias' and
>> 'rfc822MailMember' from it, but not sure now.
>> I've done our own schema ages ago with
>> suretecMailAlias/suretecMailAliasMember, so might stick with that, but
>> wanted to use a bundled schema for most things.
>> Should we stick with our own for Mail Aliases, or use bundled?
> We've been using it in production for (literally) years with no
> problems; I guess somebody should remove those two lines, I never
> noticed them ...
Is an ITS the best place?
> Tonni Earnshaw
> tonni @ barlaeus.nl