[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: damaged index on openldap replica

To: David Pruem <pruem@hdm-stuttgart.de>, openldap-software@openldap.org
Subject: Re: damaged index on openldap replica
From: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@stanford.edu>
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 11:55:41 -0800
Content-disposition: inline
In-reply-to: <45465174.4080805@hdm-stuttgart.de>
References: <45423F1E.2020209@hdm-stuttgart.de> <C2538C9F447B0FF475CD66C3@SW-90-717-287-3.stanford.edu> <9EA3621953F51A9AB2F53F36@SW-90-717-287-3.stanford.edu> <45465174.4080805@hdm-stuttgart.de>

--On Monday, October 30, 2006 8:24 PM +0100 David Pruem <pruem@hdm-stuttgart.de> wrote:


Im using the ldbm backend as was suggested for debian (I can't recall
from where I got this). I think it internally uses bdb 4.3


Well, definitely don't use LDBM.

I would rather stay with the version packaged with my distribution if
there is no known issue with it.


There are lots of known problems with the release you are using.

I have no control over the master-server, but as far as i know it also
uses an openldap 2.2.x.

You may wish to talk with whomever runs the master, and see if you can coordinate upgrading to something more recent and supported.

--Quanah

--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Principal Software Developer
ITS/Shared Application Services
Stanford University
GnuPG Public Key: http://www.stanford.edu/~quanah/pgp.html

References:
- damaged index on openldap replica
  - From: David Pruem <pruem@hdm-stuttgart.de>
- Re: damaged index on openldap replica
  - From: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@stanford.edu>
- Re: damaged index on openldap replica
  - From: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@stanford.edu>
- Re: damaged index on openldap replica
  - From: David Pruem <pruem@hdm-stuttgart.de>

Prev by Date: Re: damaged index on openldap replica
Next by Date: Re: damaged index on openldap replica
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread