[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: damaged index on openldap replica
Im using the ldbm backend as was suggested for debian (I can't recall
from where I got this). I think it internally uses bdb 4.3
I would rather stay with the version packaged with my distribution if
there is no known issue with it.
I have no control over the master-server, but as far as i know it also
uses an openldap 2.2.x.
Quanah Gibson-Mount schrieb:
> --On Friday, October 27, 2006 10:48 AM -0700 Quanah Gibson-Mount
> <email@example.com> wrote:
>> --On Friday, October 27, 2006 7:17 PM +0200 David Pruem
>> <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>>> I'm running an openldap 2.2.23 replica on a debian 3.1 (sarge) system.
>>> Once in a while the index gets damaged and I have to use slapreindex to
>>> get authentication working again.
>>> The master server is running on fedora core (I don't know the version).
>>> Is there anything I can do about this problem?
>> Well, I've never seen that behavior, and your report is kind of vague on
>> the details. But I'd certainly recommend using a current version of
>> OpenLDAP (2.3.28 is the current release). Or at least use 2.2.30, which
>> was the final 2.2 release.
>> What version of BDB is your replica using? 4.2? 4.3?
> Howard reminded me to ask... What database backend are you using? LDBM?
> Quanah Gibson-Mount
> Principal Software Developer
> ITS/Shared Application Services
> Stanford University
> GnuPG Public Key: http://www.stanford.edu/~quanah/pgp.html
Hochschule der Medien
++49 (0)711 25706 114