[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: upgrade to 2.3.19 from 2.1.22

To: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@stanford.edu>
Subject: Re: upgrade to 2.3.19 from 2.1.22
From: Howard Chu <hyc@symas.com>
Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2006 14:19:42 -0700
Cc: matthew sporleder <msporleder@gmail.com>, OpenLDAP software list <openldap-software@openldap.org>
In-reply-to: <5667640724A116BFF6B0804C@SW-90-717-287-3.stanford.edu>
References: <b0459d5c0602081050u72b5031cn9fe475b079674873@mail.gmail.com> <200602081157.14313.quanah@stanford.edu> <200602081220.58975.quanah@stanford.edu> <b0459d5c0610031336k5e9dec6dk86ffb72cbdfe2798@mail.gmail.com> <5667640724A116BFF6B0804C@SW-90-717-287-3.stanford.edu>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9a1) Gecko/20060911 Netscape/7.2 (ax) Firefox/1.5 SeaMonkey/1.5a

Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:

--On Tuesday, October 03, 2006 4:36 PM -0400 matthew sporleder <msporleder@gmail.com> wrote:
Is entryCSN used for anything other than syncrepl?
I'm rehatching this old thread to find out about the opposite
direction.  2.3 masters replicating to 2.1 replicas.  I've done some
testing and didn't notice any problems, but I was using slurpd and a
pretty simple setup.
Yeah, I think it is syncrepl specific, but I'm not 100% sure on that. ;)


Right, nothing in 2.1 uses the entryCSN.

--
  -- Howard Chu
  Chief Architect, Symas Corp.  http://www.symas.com
  Director, Highland Sun        http://highlandsun.com/hyc
  OpenLDAP Core Team            http://www.openldap.org/project/

References:
- Re: upgrade to 2.3.19 from 2.1.22
  - From: "matthew sporleder" <msporleder@gmail.com>
- Re: upgrade to 2.3.19 from 2.1.22
  - From: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@stanford.edu>

Prev by Date: Re: upgrade to 2.3.19 from 2.1.22
Next by Date: Re: incomplete slapcat
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread