[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: Re: Transaction logging and OpenLDAP
On 8/11/06, Alexander Samad <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 01:32:31PM -0400, matthew sporleder wrote:
> On 8/11/06, Tech Guy <email@example.com> wrote:
> >I understand that there have been several discussions
> >in the past about transaction logging on OpenLDAP. I
> I thought I remembered reading about a DB_CONFIG variable that would,
> essentially, turn of transactions for bdb (thus eliminating the logs).
> However, I don't think there's a good reason to do so. My testing
> has shown that ldbm (the non-transactional bdb) is simply slower. The
> I/O from these logs files is minimal, and they don't even take up much
> space with autoremove turned on.
> The DB_LOG_AUTOREMOVE makes the db_archive redundant, by the way.
> I don't think forcing the checkpoint is necessary, either. Especially
> if you don't want to keep the log files around, and only doing one/day
> doesn't make a lot of sense unless it's followed by a few other
> scripts for backups. Why not run them every hour? Or just set the
> set_lg_max in DB_CONFIG to control the size of the transaction logs,
> and autoremove will take care of the ones that aren't needed for
> running. 10MB of write activity for an hour isn't exactly taxing on
> any modern system.
where is the docu on the autoremove ?
http://www.sleepycat.com/docs/ref/toc.html which leads to
http://www.sleepycat.com/docs/ref/transapp/logfile.html which has a link to