[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: ACLs with ip control



I omitted a detail : it works fine if the command is used with an authenticated user.
--
Emmanuel Aubert


Quoting Aaron Richton <richton@nbcs.rutgers.edu>:

==> by anonymous peername.ip=10.0.0.253 read

I don't think that's valid syntax because you have two <who> clauses, anonymous and peername.ip. Try only
by peername.ip="10.0.0.253 read"
without "anonymous". I'd expect something like this to show up on "slaptest -d acl". If you want additive "anonymous and peername.ip" behavior see "<control>" directives.



I didn't read the ACLs thoroughly to see if they'd work with this change, but it's a starting point...





---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.